PERAN BIROKRASI KELEMBAGAAN DALAM PENERAPAN PENGENDALIAN HAMA TERPADU

RR. Siti Astuti

Abstract


This study aimed to know the role of institutional bureaucracy in the implementation of integrated pest management. The study was conducted in April 2012 in central Java. IPM institutionalization efforts in Indonesia influenced by a lot of constraints such as constraints conceptual, institutional structures, program priorities, ego-sectoral and ego-discipline and empowerment of farmers. Strategies undertaken by the government is the institutionalization of plant protection, the development of management information systems, strengthening forecasting and observation, the provision of appropriate technology and site-specific duna, provision of protection and stabilization of pest control. The role of institutional bureaucracy in the implementation of IPM in central Java is not optimal because of weak cooperation and coordination among stakeholders as well as good organizational structure has not stabilized both central and local levels as a result of regional autonomy policy. Collaborative efforts and networks need both locally, nationally and globally. Cooperation and networking will provide additional information as a result of the activities of the exchange of information related to IPM.

Keywords: institutional bureaucracy, integrated pest management (IPM)


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bajwa, W. I dan Marcos, K. 2003. Online Resources for Integrated Pest Management Information Delivery and Exchange. In K. M. Mareda, D. Dakouo and D. Mota-Sanchez (eds) Integrated Pest Management in The Global Arena. CAB International. 9-18.

Brannen, J. 1997. Memadu Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta. 226p.

Departemen Pertanian. 1986. Instruksi Presiden No.3 tahun 1986 tentang Pengendalian Hama Wereng Coklat Padi.

Departemen Pertanian. 1992. UU No.12 tahun 1992 tentang Sistem Budidaya Tanaman.

Departemen Pertanian. 1995. PP No 6 tahun 1995 tentang Perlindungan Tanaman.

Indraningsih, K. S., B. G. Sugihen, P. Tjitropranoto, P. S. Asngari., dan H. Wijayanto. 2010. Kinerja Penyuluh dari Perspektif Petani dan Eksistensi Penyuluh Swadaya sebagai Pendamping Penyuluh Pertanian. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 8 (4): 302-321.

Lipsky, M. 2007. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. In Wilson Wong (eds) Politics of Policy Making and Implementation. Book Report.

Martono, E. 2006. SLPHT sebagai Lembaga Pemberdayaan Petani. Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pertanian. 2 (1): 1-5p

Subejo. 2006. Penyuluhan Pertanian Indonesia di Tengah Isu Desentralisasi, Privatisasi dan Demokratisasi. Jurnal Penyuluhan. 2 (2): 69-76p

Sugiyono. 2004. Statistik Non parametric untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta. Bandung. 158p

Untung, K. 1990. Penggunaan Pestisida oleh Petani Tanaman Pangan di Propinsi Jawa Tengah dan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta pada Tahun 1989. http://i_lib.ugm.ac.id.Diunduh tanggal 3 April 2011

Untung, K. 1996. Institutional Constraints on IPM Implementation in Indonesia. In Waibel, HandJ. C. Zadoks (eds). Institutional Constraints to IPM Publication. No 3 the Pesticide Policy Project. Hannover.

Untung, K. 2000. Pelembagaan Konsep Pengendalian Hama Terpadu di Indonesia. Jurnal Perlindungan Tanaman Indonesia. 6 (1): 1-8p

Untung, K. 2007. Kebijakan Perlindungan Tanaman. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta. 256p.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55259/jiip.v22i2.255

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter View My Stats