VARIASI PROPORSI AMPAS UBI KAYU TAK TERFERMENTASI dan ACI TERHADAP DAYA KEMBANG, DAYA SERAP dan KUALITAS SENSORIS RENGGINANG

Bernadetta Budi Setiawati

Abstract


The aim of this research is to determine the best proportion of the unfermented cassava waste and cassava starch on development and adsorption power and sensory quality of cassava rengginang. The research method using a design structured factorially composed of two factors; the first was the added cassava waste consisting of five levels symbolised with (A) i.e. A1 = 30%, A2 = 40%, A3 = 50%, A4=60% and A5 = 70% and the second was the addition of cassava starch consisting of 5 levels symbolised with (C) i.e. C1=70%, C2= 60%, C3= 50%, C4 = 40% and C5= 30%. The observed variables are the sensory quality of the produced cassava rengginang including texture, colour, flavour and taste. The development power and the adsorption power were measured by comparing the perimeter and weight of the crude(unprocessed) and the fried (processed) cassava rengginang respectively. The cassava rengginang that is most preferred by the panellists with the highest development power off 61,49% is the combination of A2 C2 using a proportion between cassava waste and cassava starch of 40:60. The lowest oil adsorption power of 34,55% is shown by the combination of A1C1 with a proportion between cassava waste and cassava starch of 30:70 while for the sensory quality of texture, flavour and taste is shown by the combination A2C2 with a proportion between cassava waste and cassava starch of 40:60, whereas concerning the colour, the combination A1C1 is most preferred with a proportion between cassava waste and starch of 30:70.

Keywords: Cassava Waste, Development Power, Adsorption Power and Sensory Quality of cassava rengginang.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonim, 2011. Rengginang Ubi, Penganan Biasa dari Bahan Tidak Biasa. Diunduh dari http://epetani.deptan.go.id/budidaya/rengginang-ubi-penganan-biasa-dari-bahan-tidak-biasa-3575 (12Apri2012).

Djafar, T. F. dan Siti, R. 2003. Ubi Kayu dan Olahannya. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

Kartika, B., Hastuti, P. dan Supartono, W. 1988. Pedoman Uji Inderawi Bahan Pangan. PAU Pangan dan Gizi UGM. Yogyakarta.

Kusumaningrum, I. 2005. Analisa Faktor Daya Kembang dan Daya Serap Kerupuk Rumput Laut pada Variasi Proporsi Rumput Laut. https://jtpunmul.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/vol-42-3-indratikusumaningrum.pdf pada tanggal 15 April 2013

Sarwono. 1986. Penelitian Organoleptik. Rhineka Cipta. Yogyakarta.

Sastrosupadi. A. 2000. Rancangan Percobaan Praktis Bidang Pertanian. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta. Setiawan, H. 1988. Mempelajari karakteristik fisikokimia kerupuk dari berbagai taraf formulasi tapioka, tepung kentang dan tepungj agung. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Siswantoro. 2009. Perubahan Volume dan Kadar Air Kerupuk Selama Pengorengan dengan Menggunakan Pasir. Makalah Seminar Nasional UNSUD Purwokerto. htpp://sis07w.wordpress.com. (3 Maret 2012)

Suprapti, M. L. 2005. Tepung Tapioka: Pembuatan dan Pemanfaatannya. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

Tahir. S. 1985. Mempelajari pembuatan dan karakteristik kerupuk dari tepung sagu (Metroxylon Sagu R.). Skripsi. Jurusan Teknologi Pertanian. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Hasanudin. Ujung Pandang.

Valerina Darwis, 2009. Analisis Usaha Tani dan Pemasaran Ubi Kayu Serta Teknologi Pengolahan Tapioka di Kabupaten Pati, JawaTengah. Disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional Peningkatan Daya Saing Agribisnis Berorientasi Kesejahteraan Petani di Bogor, Deptan.

Witono Tri, 2011. Antara Rengginang Singkong Bojonegoro Dan Pathilo Gunungkidul, diakses dari http://www.triwitono.staff.ugm.ac.id/index.php?option=comcontent&view=article&id=52 (20 April 2012).

Yu, S. Y., J. R. Mitchell and Abdullah. 1993. Effect of rice starch on the linier expansion of fish crackers (keropok). Tropical Science 33 (3): 319-321.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55259/jiip.v22i2.250

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter View My Stats